Bad Policy by Right or Left still equals Collapse

For Certification and Compliance call:    +01 (347) 708-0314 or  +44 207 193-8387

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  etilley 6 months, 2 weeks ago.

  • Author
  • #4898



    Bad Policy equals Social Collapse

    Liberal, Conservative, Green or NDP – Your Poor Policy Making is Collapsing Canada

    Maxim Bernier is hoping to be your next Conservative Party Leader by cashing in on Trump’s successful formula for emotional followers, and this candidate reports $400k in campaign donations as well. What is worrisome in this, and what is worrisome in most leadership candidates today, is that they so often present the worst possible policies for leading the country as well.

    Canada has sustained 20 years of contraction and collapse trending at the hands of parties both left and right while other countries have sustained these hard economic times and even prospered.

    In Canada, there appears to be no process for evaluating policy; no business case; too few SME (Subject Matter Expert) pros and cons discussion. Its all “I feel”; or “good people know”; “bad people don’t understand” – messages strewn with emotional rubbish.

    Working Canadians represent 50% of us in a shrinking job market; 15% of the labour force are unemployed; of this group, half have unemployment insurance and the other half have no incomes; or they take support at 1/7th the Cost of Living in the GTA.

    Mr Bernier’s latest post (below) showcases what is brutally wrong with simple conservatism or liberalism the same; and this is why many Canadians will say that Ottawa is completely out of touch with the rest of the country.

    Why are we as voters not asking for Business Cases? Nor managing by proven evidence in GDP stats that a suggested policy is sound? There are 200 other countries with track records on every policy you could think of. Consider that “a Conservative” is supposed to be the one who asks for essential decision-making data every time that a decision must made, and yet Conservatives and Liberals from both parties, have lost themselves to emotion due to the poor training they received in our high school systems…

    The Right and Left groups were never both supposed to put forward policy that did not manage the country responsibly; each was supposed to take a slightly different approach to responsible government policy that managed the country well. Instead policy groups for major parties convene mostly non-experts to decide the policies of the nation.

    Can you explain Ontario’s multi-billion dollar investments in low-yield, part-time energy sources Wind & Solar? There is no Engineering Merit in the choice – we need energy full-time. Germany is experiencing Energy Poverty after making a similar mistake – so clearly there was data available to dissuade Ontario’s energy decisions. But no-one thought to look abroad for energy policy track-records?

    Democratic Reforms in Policy Making

    In Canada, top cancer experts have the same vote on policy as retired manufacturing workers – even in healthcare matters. Worse, during our elections, marketing staff switch up policy in a patch-work quilt of guesses at what might win votes. Policy Making here is a thinly disguised amateur circus – and Canadians have suffered greatly by the decisions that have emerged.

    Turning around these problem policies is straight forward, but that message is obfuscated by a thousand voices that stand in staunch disagreement – and this is democracy right? Hardly. This is more like an admission that we don’t understand how to make democracy work properly – and whenever there is an education gap like this one – it can be manipulated by special interests too.

    Here is how Policy Development is supposed to work: Policy is developed by experts who are qualified to build what Aristotle called a “Right Plan” (Aristotle was also the philosopher who designed our modern education curriculums).

    A Right Plan is a comprehensive plan of worthwhile projects that lead to a sustainable society. China did this 25 years ago and look where they are today.

    With the Right Planning in place, Right and Left parties take liberal or Conservative approaches to implementing this solid planning, and then we democratic voters choose a management team to implement the Right Plan that experts have completed research and business cases to prove merit-worthiness. That’s how it should work; with long-term planning and confirmed social progress.

    Consider the two discussions Tax Spending on Guaranteed Incomes vs Low-Tax Policy:

    Option 1: Tax Increases via Guaranteed Incomes

    The math says that Canada could generate $630 billion in new export revenue annually via Guaranteed Incomes and policies that renew spending-power. The program would cost $40 billion offset by $7 bill in new export tax revenue (these costs are estimated on the high side). Overall taxes could drop by 9.5% as well – after paying for these Guaranteed Incomes. For this spending, there is a 1500% (15-times) Return on Investment. See table at the bottom of the page…

    Other benefits from Guaranteed Incomes and Policy that return spending-power include:

    1. Considerable building industry Automation productivity & Hitech industry boosts
    2. Reliance on Immigration falls
    3. Inequity starts correcting toward 1960s levels
    4. Homelessness is almost wiped out
    5. Other programs in housing, onshoring are supported
    6. Incarceration, Unemployment, and other Social Problems are reduced

    Option 2:  Reducing Tax – as Maxim suggests, is actually a road to Social Collapse – hardly pragmatic Conservatism.

    Social collapse takes time, but “low tax” and uncorrected “Liberte” in Capitalism are actually the time-honoured road to Collapse.

    How to recognize Good Policy 

    A policy calling for lower tax has a very unfavorable Business Case; it was 1985’s “Low Tax” (Reaganomics) policies that landed us in a Global Depression in 2016. Suggesting policy with no promise of Return on Investment,  showcases poor planning and a poor education in understanding what are the right policies to spend our tax money on.

    For example: you can only pay taxes when have an income. If you have an income by a job (this is 17.5 million of 36 million people – 50% of Canadians), you pay for everyone else and your country collapses under the strain of too few paying for too many.

    What does Social Collapse from a lack of responsible government controls look like? 

    1. Inequity increases, salaries drop to slave-wages, or people have no spending power with their incomes
    2. Incomes become scarce as well, job-loss and homelessness increases
    3. Incarceration rates increase and social problems like divorce rate risk
    4. Trickle-down is a proven failure due to business ethics failings and a lack of laws that make business accountable
    5. Reliance on immigration revenue increases
    6. Revolutions and war are not far behind as society continues to collapse – unless the Economy is Reset by TE-Mature Policies.

    Canada, and most of the G20, hover around Step 5 of this list.

    Statistics for a Guaranteed Incomes Business Case indicate that most countries would benefit more by guaranteed incomes that ensure all can continue to support the economy. As long as these new income distributions are not channelled back into housing bubbles and spending power is restored in other ways, the economic turn-around should be pervasive

    Country America Germany Canada U.K Australia
    Export Per Capita (in billions) $5,057 $  18,316 $ 13,286 $ 7,378 $ 10,446
    Exports ($bill) $  1,510 $  1,309 $ 411 $ 436 $ 188
    Export Increase 665% 184% 253% 456% 322%
    Opportunity Cost ($bill) $ 8,538 $ 1,096 630 $ 1,553 $ 418
    Cost of Living $ 2,500 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,500 $ 3,000
    Population (million) 324 82 36.5 65 24.2
    Labor force (million) 155.4 44.2 19 30.8 12.4
    Unemployment 5.0% 4.5% 6.8% 5.0% 6.8%
    Current Benefits 15% 14%
    Total Cost ($bill) $ 233 $ 60 $ 40 $ 64.6 $ 30
    GDP ($bill) $17,348 $ 3,868 $ 1,785 $ 2,989 $  1,472
    Tax Inc vs GDP 26.9% 40.6% 32.0% 39.0% 25.8%
    Total Tax Revenues ($bill) $  4,666 $ 1,570 $ 571 $1,166 $ 379
    New Tax ($bill) $ 3,618 $  1,466 $516 $997 $ 347
    Tax Increase -22.45% -6.59% -9.53% -14.45% – 8.5 %
    Tax Rev New Export (15%) $bill $ 1,280 $ 164 $ 516 $ 233 $ 62
    ROI 3663% 1801% 1574% 2405% 1374%


    reset2What are Policies that Reset Economies, create Incomes and Renew Spending Power, according to Transition Economics Maturity Models




    Read more about Transition Economics, Maturity Modelling in the new book  Transition Economics – The Science of Sustainability



Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


©2017 All rights Reserved, CSQ Research and DashFlows Media Group

Translate »

Log in with your credentials


Forgot your details?